Top Court OKs Medical 2nd Opinions

By TAMMY WEBBER, Associated Press Writer Fri Jun 21, 3:39 AM ET CHICAGO (AP) - When Debra Moran's insurer refused to pay for an operation to treat her debilitating nerve problem, she didn't take no for an answer. She got a second opinion. When her HMO still wouldn't pay even after an outside reviewer found the operation medically necessary, Moran footed the $94,000 bill by borrowing money and maxing out her credit cards. Then she went to court. Moran's desire to be reimbursed swayed the Supreme Court on Thursday in a decision that potentially affects more than 70 million Americans whose employers buy coverage from a health insurance company. The court ruled that states can require health plans to accept an outside, second opinion when there is a dispute with a patient over paying for care. "I really shows that if you're adamant about your position, the justice system works for you," said Moran, who hopes the ruling encourages other patients to seek second opinions. "They need to know the laws are out there," she said. Independent reviews are not frequently sought. In 2000, about 2,500 cases were accepted for full review in 16 states surveyed by the American Association of Health Plans. The reviewer upheld the decision made by the insurers' doctors in about half of those. Health care advocates say one reason for the low numbers is that people are unaware of the option. That could change with the attention from Moran's case. Moran's health problems began in 1995. Physical therapy and other treatments recommended by her primary care doctor did not relieve her arm pain, so she sought the opinion of a surgeon who did not participate in her health plan. That doctor recommended a more extensive surgery, for which Rush Prudential HMO Inc. refused to pay. The Supreme Court's 5-4 vote affirms a ruling by the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, which said under Illinois law, Moran was entitled to both the review and the reimbursement. The court also endorsed similar laws in 41 other states intended to let people get second opinions, and sometimes force health maintenance organizations to pay up if an independent review shows a surgery or other care is justified. The court said that state laws, in trying to better arm patients in their battles with big managed-care companies, did not contradict a confusing 1974 federal law. Justice David H. Souter, writing for the majority, said that when an HMO guarantees "medically necessary" care like Moran's company did, states can allow an independent reviewer to look at the necessity. Dissenting Justice Clarence Thomas said the ruling "undermines the ability of HMOs to control costs, which, in turn, undermines the ability of employers to provide health care coverage for employees." Moran, of Winfield, Ill., said she knew the vote would be close. "It's been a long time," said Moran, who filed a lawsuit in 1998. "The champagne's been in the refrigerator a long time." Ron Pollack, president of Families USA, a liberal group that has been lobbying for a federal patients' rights bill, said the ruling could affect 70 million Americans. It does not help the estimated 60 million people whose employers use self-insured plans. Employers and insurance companies said the decision would increase the cost of coverage. HMOs had argued they were not opposed to independent review boards but wanted one national standard instead of the hodgepodge of state laws. "By forcing employers and health plans to adhere to potentially 50 different conflicting state external review requirements, the court has dealt them a blow in the battle to control the already soaring cost of health care for working families," said a statement from the Health Benefits Coalition, a group of businesses. The American Medical Association said the decision "represents a major victory for America's patients and their physicians." The ruling also lifts some pressure from Congress, which has failed to pass a national patients' rights plan calling for a nationwide system for independent evaluations. The plan has been stalled for months at the Capitol because of the Sept. 11 attacks.

HEADLINE NEWS

(Click on underlined headings for complete story)

ANTHEM BLUE CROSS ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LIPITOR GENERIC: On November 30, 2011, Anthem Blue Cross added a new generic drug called Atorvastatin to tier 1.

Seniors Get A Break on Medicare Part B Premiums: Part B premiums for Medicare beneficiaries will rise less than originally anticipated next year, the Department of Health and Human Services announced Thursday.

Obama Administration cuts California Medi-Cal Reimbursements: The Obama administration approved significant Medi-Cal cuts Thursday that health care providers and patient advocates warn will reduce access for California's most vulnerable residents.

TRUSTEES: MEDICARE HOSPITAL FUND EXTENDED 12 YEARS:  But officials cautioned Thursday that the gain will depend on achieving significant savings in health care in coming years.

American's Coming Health Care Oligopoly:  Can you say "insuragopoly"? How about "hospigopoly"? Then you better learn, because they describe how the health care system is changing under President Obama's health care reform legislation.

Health Overhaul May Mean Longer ER Waits, Overcrowding:  Rand Corp. researcher Dr. Arthur L. Kellermann predicts this from the new law: "More people will have coverage and will be less afraid to go to the emergency department if they're sick or hurt and have nowhere else to go.... We just don't have other places in the system for these folks to go."

5 PAINFUL HEALTH-CARE LESSONS FROM MASSACHUSETTS:  The best guide to how President Obama's historic health-care legislation will reshape the nation's medical marketplace and fiscal future is the pioneering model in Massachusetts. The Bay State's reform program started in late 2006, and it shares virtually all the major features of the new federal plan.

Dartmouth Study on Health Care Costs:  In selling the health care overhaul to Congress, the Obama administration cited a once obscure research group at Dartmouth College to claim that it could not only cut billions in wasteful health care spending but make people healthier by doing so.

OBAMACARE'S FUZZY MATH -- HIGH RISK POOLS WILL COST 8 TIMES WHAT IS BUDGETED:  One feature of the health overhaul that the President is touting as an immediate benefit is the expansion of so-called "high risk pools" for people who want to buy insurance but can't because of their poor health. The problem is that there's no way that $5 billion, which is what's been budgeted, will cover the cost of covering 2 million people. The real cost will be more like $40 billion.

RESCISSIONS:  MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING:  How many times have you heard President Obama say, "Health insurers won’t be able to drop your coverage just because you get sick?" Or Kathleen Sebelius? Or the Democratic leadership in Congress? Or the mainstream news media? You would think that the private health insurance industry was being revolutionized.

OBAMACARE’S HIDDEN TIME BOMB:  One of the quirks of ObamaCare is that most of its key provisions don't go into effect until 2014. But in any 2,300-page law, there are bound to be provisions that have immediate and unintended consequences. One such provision is Section 2718, entitled "Bringing Down The Cost Of Health Care Coverage."

DOCTOR SHORTAGE?  28 STATES MAY EXPAND NURSES' ROLE:   A nurse may soon be your doctor. With a looming shortage of primary care doctors, 28 states are considering expanding the authority of nurse practitioners.

Once-a-Week Workout Keeps Elderly Strong: One workout a week can mean the difference between frailty and freedom.

FDA OKs Device to Treat Back Pain: The government on Tuesday approved sales of a device that could radically change surgery for certain back pain sufferers.